Design evidence
Architecture the candidate owned, walked through in their own words during SME review.
- SME notes
- Trade-offs

Product, modernization, cybersecurity, automation and digital engineering talent for programs where a weak consultant quickly becomes delivery risk.
Digital programs rarely fail on syntax. They fail when nobody owns the seams — the integration nobody scoped, the test suite that quietly stopped running, the modernization that preserved every original constraint.
Prism screens for the judgment those moments need: what the engineer designed rather than joined, which trade-offs they consciously accepted, and how quality held when the date moved.
A framework on a resume says nothing about what happens at week nine.
Four dimensions, each checked by a practitioner in a live conversation rather than inferred from a resume.
What the candidate personally designed, which alternatives they rejected, and why.
How testing, review and standards were defended when delivery pressure arrived.
Legacy work carries constraints. Prism checks what was kept deliberately and what was rebuilt.
Whether the engineer can explain a technical trade-off to the person funding it.
Each detail exists to protect delivery time, code quality, or candidate trust.
Architecture the candidate owned, walked through in their own words during SME review.
Testing posture, review habits and how regressions were prevented rather than discovered.
Rate posture, availability and work authorization resolved before your interview loop begins.
Background verification, no-proxy controls, MSA and SLA expectations treated as delivery.
Share the platform, the constraint and the deadline. Prism returns three engineers who can defend their decisions.