Module map
Explicit depth per module, separating ownership from exposure.
- Depth
- Scope

SAP, Salesforce, Workday, Pega, Guidewire, Murex, Axiom and platform talent screened by module depth, domain context and release reality.
Enterprise platform resumes list many modules. The expensive question is which ones the person genuinely owned, at what depth, and what the release cadence looked like when something went wrong in production.
Prism separates depth from adjacency, checks domain process fluency rather than vocabulary, and confirms the candidate has lived with a platform after go-live — not just through an implementation.
Certification proves attendance. Release history proves capability.
The specifics that separate a configured module from a claimed one.
Which modules were owned, at what level, and which are honest adjacent awareness.
Environments, cadence, regression strategy and what a bad release actually taught them.
Interfaces genuinely handled, including the ones that made the estate fragile.
Whether the candidate understands the business process the platform encodes.
Depth stated precisely, so your interview time goes to fit rather than discovery.
Explicit depth per module, separating ownership from exposure.
Implementations and post-go-live support, with the release reality attached.
Industry process context confirmed during SME review, not assumed from an employer name.
Verification, protection and commercial posture resolved before submission.
Name the platform, the modules and the release pressure. Prism calibrates depth against your environment.